"Do not lie with the judiciary, we are stronger!" Submitted by Father
Lingen on Thu, 2008-09-11 08:31.
"Do not lie with the judiciary, we are stronger!"
This has the word brd now-literally and publicly declared. This explicitly acknowledges the brd to Darling as the maxim: The law is not founded on truth, but there is simply the law of the jungle, the "law of the jungle" (cf. English Faust Law = law of the jungle). In that sense, the term "legal jungle" of brd actually a much deeper meaning.
The context of these self-brd revelation was the well-known show trial against the SA Regensburg Rüdiger Jung (2 KL 107 Js 12915/2007). Here are just a guide only: Rüdiger Jung had advocated that judges are to uphold the law are generally respected and that the abuses of the fixed brd. The success of Jung's efforts: young has long been deprived of time in the closed psychiatric his freedom and Zyprexa fully pumped (added effects: drowsiness, obesity, liver dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, dizziness, constipation, extrapyramidal disorder (impaired coordination of movements), etc .). Now Jung has incapacitated, although now free floating, but must continue to swallow Zyprexa. The Federal Court granted the young one case in March 2008: The ruling can briefing "do not have a stock, a legally viable reasons for a placement order will not be excluded." The Supreme Court of the maxim is so brd: First time destroy the ruthless critic, like with compulsory admission and "psychotropic drugs", a justification is unnecessary, because she might perhaps be found some day.
The handling of brd with those telling the truth and stand up for justice, is always basically the same. The Munich Lawyer Rolf Bossi (author of "demi-gods in Black") took exception to the "cronyism" in the judiciary and the camaraderie has not been turned off, but at least Bossi was sentenced for his remark to 12,000 euro fine. The journalist Juergen Roth (author of "The Germany-Clan - The network of unscrupulous politicians, top managers and Justice") took exception to the "rule of justice" in Saxony. The rule of justice has not been turned off, but still being waged against Roth now a criminal conviction for "insulting the state". The list of cases of this nature is endless. The targeted destruction of freedom of expression has become even a brd judge as patron: Andreas Buske (LG Hamburg) is the quintessential "Buskeismus.
admit To be fair, that the brd not always punished as draconian. Although, any legitimate criticism of evil, injurious to the public grievances are now available as "insulting", "insulting the state", "sedition" etc. punished. But one can defend anyway, especially because contains the "offense clause" § 185 StGB no certainty, so he acc. Article 103 GG / § 1 StGB / Article 7 of the ECHR is purely illegal and therefore null and void. That means you can not prove that it did not infringe the § 185 of the Criminal Code because it contains no definition, therefore, the arbitrariness of the brd is absolutely limitless. And the need brd so not even their victims to prove a debt, see all the cases have proven to judge which condemned the innocent intent. The judiciary has absolutely nothing to offer as an accusation, it stands out with the completely opaque to the phrase "common knowledge" on. Now what clemency for "insulting offenses" relates to it is worth remembering that the brd "authorities" can prove myself every impunity with expletives and libel, see, eg, the presiding judge Schwill of "Landgericht Bonn," the impunity despite numerous criminal complaints all process viewer as "morons" insulted. The freedom to go even further brd-sensitive: Certainly, Innocents end up in prison, often for years. Not so with guilty: How was the end of May 2008, the Turk convicted Erdinc S., after a 44-year-old wrongly beaten into a coma and thus nursing care had in the Cologne district court judge Hans-Werner Riehe a free man, released from the courtroom. Riehe recognized the existence of the guilt of the offender, ordered him but only for an "anti-Agressionstraining. For this punishment has to be thankful probably because Riehe would indeed miss out on any punishment, and instead simply to quote from the Koran, such as: "When you meet unbelievers, slay them by their havoc among them a great slaughter, and moves the chains of prisoners tightly together "(47th sura, verse 4) As a reminder. A German-Moroccan had applied iJ 2007 in Frankfurt, the divorce because she was beaten by her husband and threatened with murder but the so-called Koranic judge of the district court. rejected: "This [Moroccan] culture, it is not unusual that the man does in respect of the woman a right to punish. This was to be expected, who was born in Germany applicant when she married grew up in Morocco defendant "By the way. Meanwhile, against Erdinc S. A new method opens up, because he reportedly said on June 23 struck without reason on a passerby and Riehen. is not always so reluctant to Criminal Round: Against a rapporteur (DCRS) on this Riehe Rating Riehe has even filed a complaint. So serious violent crime may still be okay, but there is no mercy for legitimate and necessary reports on the judiciary.
The general findings on the state of brd-Justice are generally rather disappointing. Known is the word of "Federal Constitutional Court" retired Prof. Willi Geiger: "In Germany you can, instead of leading a process, as well roll the dice" (German newspaper Richter, 9 / 1982, p. 325). However, it would be a fatal belittlement when you thought it would be easy only incompetence and lack of interest in the judge caste. For as incompetent, and - in terms of the case - disinterested brd judges always be like one hand there are very basic rules that even with rough edge incompetence can not be overlooked, and on the other hand, have judges quite a fanatical interest: just out to destroy justice and to create injustice. Protect the crime - punish the righteous! This is the maxim of the iron brd Justice.
Think also of the public statement of ex-Judge Frank Fahsel (SZ, 02:04:08): I countless judges, prosecutors, and prosecutors have had to experience that one can simply "criminal" call. [...] I have ... ... just incredible how numerous, the system organized breaches of the law and legal inflections seen not to cope with the was / is because they conform to the system, "added As Prof. Dr. Hans-Joachim Selenz." Best way to the state in parts of the German judiciary is get to the point that abuse by means of which political and economic rule of law. [...] explicitly criminal justice activities abound. [...] The bottom includes the highest German courts. Therefore, there is virtually no conviction for violation of the law, obstruction of justice in office and advantage ". See further the article in Der Spiegel ("Maischberger of miscarriage of justice", 28.05.08): "The judiciary is controlled themselves by has set up a chain of command that runs from the District Court of the District Court and the Court of Appeal to the Federal Court and the Constitutional Court. But God help the man who embarks on this path. His prospects, for Michael to be Kohlhaas are larger than this, that it justice is done. "
And in a review of the latest book by Prof. Hans Herbert von Arnim (the Germany Act. What do to politicians and business leaders of our country) summarizes the TV station 3sat (culture time, 15.05.2008) the situation in our country this succinctly as follows: ". Our system is - in good German - in the ass"
The system can hold, therefore, only in that it any change for the better immediately nipped in the bud, so it lives by the death of the righteous. Just how we, as one can see from videos of graswurzel.tv (gegenstrom08: cast power plant construction site Moorburg Hamburg, 23.08.2008). Go to the video it says on the grassroots website: "After we filmed the thrashing officials did this purposefully to our cameraman and snatched him his press card was then stamped on him with batons and fists, neither service nor train was us about this.. officials reported. " has
What are the prospects of the citizens to take action against offenders brd, shows also the article "The colleague helps. More and commit crimes again in the Berlin police Service. Sued them for it almost never ", Jungle World, 18.12.2002. It is Ö includes well-known case of Levent. Presented, the four police officers an open nasal fracture, a skull-brain trauma and other injuries to her in any way unauthorized intrusion in his home inflicted. Levent Ö. thanks to the fearless use of brd permanently incapacitated. He filed a criminal complaint for assault, which led in fact to criminal proceedings, uz Ö against Levent. because of "resistance against the state".
How safe is against violence in Germany, it can - albeit muted - and the victim of torture, murder in the JVA Siegburg testify for the result of this. two-hour orgy of torture, so the death of the victim, it is immaterial whether the prison guards simply looked the subtle - perhaps even more consuming beer and chips - have been watching them on.
Still, the vast majority of Germans do not seek truth and justice, but the superstar, the perfect dinner, the gate of the month, etc., and as such remain largely undisturbed, except for containing what the other disadvantages of the concerns brd with mass unemployment, mass poverty, mass stupidity, etc. Maybe you lose even a relative who is abroad on illegal wars of aggression involved in the FRG, but otherwise it's the Germans actually quite good.
And to the little judicial overview here include: The European Court of Human Rights [ECHR] has 75529/01 ECHR judgments on 08.06.2006 stated that violations of human rights under Article 6 and 13 in the MRK brd. This decision by the ECHR on Article 6 ECHR and 13 states in the tenor, that an effective legal remedy against abuse of rights and equitable relief for compliance with the law on due process in the brd not exist! Translated into simple terms this means that the so-called "Federal Republic of Germany" is not quite effective rule of law!
It can thus be impossible to deny: the judiciary is actually stronger than the right, she bends the law with might and thus unquestionable right to their known Entitled "Rechtsbeugermafia. The
brd, especially the judiciary is stronger because it is united in the fight against the law and fight for the injustice. And what about the victims justice / justice critics?
Among the critics, there are Catholics, Protestants, atheists, etc., there are "left" and "rights", etc. Even for differences in beliefs, political views, if private likes and dislikes, etc. Justice critic does not normally work together, but usually even to today. As an atheist, they are pleased about the exclusion of Catholics as "left" one looks forward to the elimination of "rights", and often pays homage to this even a Dürrenmatt-justice: It does not matter if someone is convicted, rightly or wrongly, the main thing, he is convicted.
And even more problematic: Some judges consider the brd statutory authority acting carrier, others regard brd judges mere private persons without any legitimacy. Depending on the position of course has implications for how we deal with the problem brd.
But even when things are larger concentrations of judicial critics, then come here usually only a few completely unobtrusive, rather ridiculous "demonstrations" about, read about the not even in the local section of the associated small-town press, a note is. The judiciary have no critics Batons and no tear gas, and they have (well, probably mostly) and certainly not the interest, others to break the nose and inflicting a skull-brain trauma. They withdraw, while the brd with bestial cruelty strikes on them.
In addition: Anyone who stands up for other stops, so that even his own head. In a specific case anyone was convicted of criticism of the abortion innocent to 50 days. A disinterested third party, criticized this judicial crime and it was then himself innocent sentenced to 60 days. Who is already known for his own cases harassed by the brd that quickly passes the wish to learn because of solidarity with other victims brd additionally the oppressed.
Here one could begin only if at least would be the interest of justice in the foreground. This means: You would have to reject injustice even if it was to meet someone whose views are not dividing, or even rejects it. A Catholic would also be used for a Hitler-admirer may, in the event that the Hitler-admirer happens to manifest injustice. And if you judge the brd now for governmental official shall be arbitrary or harassing individuals sees that this tangible injustice can be branded in any case as an injustice, regardless of the further steps that we deem suitable for contrast. One might also consider why in the parable of the unjust judge has complied with the request of the widow (Luke 18,1-8). As long as everyone laments
only his own misfortune, possibly even with glee at the injustice suffered by third parties and is watching everyone else out of the way confrontation, is the judiciary stronger. Man himself is, however, still have to answer for the strength of brutal justice, in one way or another.
Lingen on Thu, 2008-09-11 08:31.
"Do not lie with the judiciary, we are stronger!"
This has the word brd now-literally and publicly declared. This explicitly acknowledges the brd to Darling as the maxim: The law is not founded on truth, but there is simply the law of the jungle, the "law of the jungle" (cf. English Faust Law = law of the jungle). In that sense, the term "legal jungle" of brd actually a much deeper meaning.
The context of these self-brd revelation was the well-known show trial against the SA Regensburg Rüdiger Jung (2 KL 107 Js 12915/2007). Here are just a guide only: Rüdiger Jung had advocated that judges are to uphold the law are generally respected and that the abuses of the fixed brd. The success of Jung's efforts: young has long been deprived of time in the closed psychiatric his freedom and Zyprexa fully pumped (added effects: drowsiness, obesity, liver dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, dizziness, constipation, extrapyramidal disorder (impaired coordination of movements), etc .). Now Jung has incapacitated, although now free floating, but must continue to swallow Zyprexa. The Federal Court granted the young one case in March 2008: The ruling can briefing "do not have a stock, a legally viable reasons for a placement order will not be excluded." The Supreme Court of the maxim is so brd: First time destroy the ruthless critic, like with compulsory admission and "psychotropic drugs", a justification is unnecessary, because she might perhaps be found some day.
The handling of brd with those telling the truth and stand up for justice, is always basically the same. The Munich Lawyer Rolf Bossi (author of "demi-gods in Black") took exception to the "cronyism" in the judiciary and the camaraderie has not been turned off, but at least Bossi was sentenced for his remark to 12,000 euro fine. The journalist Juergen Roth (author of "The Germany-Clan - The network of unscrupulous politicians, top managers and Justice") took exception to the "rule of justice" in Saxony. The rule of justice has not been turned off, but still being waged against Roth now a criminal conviction for "insulting the state". The list of cases of this nature is endless. The targeted destruction of freedom of expression has become even a brd judge as patron: Andreas Buske (LG Hamburg) is the quintessential "Buskeismus.
admit To be fair, that the brd not always punished as draconian. Although, any legitimate criticism of evil, injurious to the public grievances are now available as "insulting", "insulting the state", "sedition" etc. punished. But one can defend anyway, especially because contains the "offense clause" § 185 StGB no certainty, so he acc. Article 103 GG / § 1 StGB / Article 7 of the ECHR is purely illegal and therefore null and void. That means you can not prove that it did not infringe the § 185 of the Criminal Code because it contains no definition, therefore, the arbitrariness of the brd is absolutely limitless. And the need brd so not even their victims to prove a debt, see all the cases have proven to judge which condemned the innocent intent. The judiciary has absolutely nothing to offer as an accusation, it stands out with the completely opaque to the phrase "common knowledge" on. Now what clemency for "insulting offenses" relates to it is worth remembering that the brd "authorities" can prove myself every impunity with expletives and libel, see, eg, the presiding judge Schwill of "Landgericht Bonn," the impunity despite numerous criminal complaints all process viewer as "morons" insulted. The freedom to go even further brd-sensitive: Certainly, Innocents end up in prison, often for years. Not so with guilty: How was the end of May 2008, the Turk convicted Erdinc S., after a 44-year-old wrongly beaten into a coma and thus nursing care had in the Cologne district court judge Hans-Werner Riehe a free man, released from the courtroom. Riehe recognized the existence of the guilt of the offender, ordered him but only for an "anti-Agressionstraining. For this punishment has to be thankful probably because Riehe would indeed miss out on any punishment, and instead simply to quote from the Koran, such as: "When you meet unbelievers, slay them by their havoc among them a great slaughter, and moves the chains of prisoners tightly together "(47th sura, verse 4) As a reminder. A German-Moroccan had applied iJ 2007 in Frankfurt, the divorce because she was beaten by her husband and threatened with murder but the so-called Koranic judge of the district court. rejected: "This [Moroccan] culture, it is not unusual that the man does in respect of the woman a right to punish. This was to be expected, who was born in Germany applicant when she married grew up in Morocco defendant "By the way. Meanwhile, against Erdinc S. A new method opens up, because he reportedly said on June 23 struck without reason on a passerby and Riehen. is not always so reluctant to Criminal Round: Against a rapporteur (DCRS) on this Riehe Rating Riehe has even filed a complaint. So serious violent crime may still be okay, but there is no mercy for legitimate and necessary reports on the judiciary.
The general findings on the state of brd-Justice are generally rather disappointing. Known is the word of "Federal Constitutional Court" retired Prof. Willi Geiger: "In Germany you can, instead of leading a process, as well roll the dice" (German newspaper Richter, 9 / 1982, p. 325). However, it would be a fatal belittlement when you thought it would be easy only incompetence and lack of interest in the judge caste. For as incompetent, and - in terms of the case - disinterested brd judges always be like one hand there are very basic rules that even with rough edge incompetence can not be overlooked, and on the other hand, have judges quite a fanatical interest: just out to destroy justice and to create injustice. Protect the crime - punish the righteous! This is the maxim of the iron brd Justice.
Think also of the public statement of ex-Judge Frank Fahsel (SZ, 02:04:08): I countless judges, prosecutors, and prosecutors have had to experience that one can simply "criminal" call. [...] I have ... ... just incredible how numerous, the system organized breaches of the law and legal inflections seen not to cope with the was / is because they conform to the system, "added As Prof. Dr. Hans-Joachim Selenz." Best way to the state in parts of the German judiciary is get to the point that abuse by means of which political and economic rule of law. [...] explicitly criminal justice activities abound. [...] The bottom includes the highest German courts. Therefore, there is virtually no conviction for violation of the law, obstruction of justice in office and advantage ". See further the article in Der Spiegel ("Maischberger of miscarriage of justice", 28.05.08): "The judiciary is controlled themselves by has set up a chain of command that runs from the District Court of the District Court and the Court of Appeal to the Federal Court and the Constitutional Court. But God help the man who embarks on this path. His prospects, for Michael to be Kohlhaas are larger than this, that it justice is done. "
And in a review of the latest book by Prof. Hans Herbert von Arnim (the Germany Act. What do to politicians and business leaders of our country) summarizes the TV station 3sat (culture time, 15.05.2008) the situation in our country this succinctly as follows: ". Our system is - in good German - in the ass"
The system can hold, therefore, only in that it any change for the better immediately nipped in the bud, so it lives by the death of the righteous. Just how we, as one can see from videos of graswurzel.tv (gegenstrom08: cast power plant construction site Moorburg Hamburg, 23.08.2008). Go to the video it says on the grassroots website: "After we filmed the thrashing officials did this purposefully to our cameraman and snatched him his press card was then stamped on him with batons and fists, neither service nor train was us about this.. officials reported. " has
What are the prospects of the citizens to take action against offenders brd, shows also the article "The colleague helps. More and commit crimes again in the Berlin police Service. Sued them for it almost never ", Jungle World, 18.12.2002. It is Ö includes well-known case of Levent. Presented, the four police officers an open nasal fracture, a skull-brain trauma and other injuries to her in any way unauthorized intrusion in his home inflicted. Levent Ö. thanks to the fearless use of brd permanently incapacitated. He filed a criminal complaint for assault, which led in fact to criminal proceedings, uz Ö against Levent. because of "resistance against the state".
How safe is against violence in Germany, it can - albeit muted - and the victim of torture, murder in the JVA Siegburg testify for the result of this. two-hour orgy of torture, so the death of the victim, it is immaterial whether the prison guards simply looked the subtle - perhaps even more consuming beer and chips - have been watching them on.
Still, the vast majority of Germans do not seek truth and justice, but the superstar, the perfect dinner, the gate of the month, etc., and as such remain largely undisturbed, except for containing what the other disadvantages of the concerns brd with mass unemployment, mass poverty, mass stupidity, etc. Maybe you lose even a relative who is abroad on illegal wars of aggression involved in the FRG, but otherwise it's the Germans actually quite good.
And to the little judicial overview here include: The European Court of Human Rights [ECHR] has 75529/01 ECHR judgments on 08.06.2006 stated that violations of human rights under Article 6 and 13 in the MRK brd. This decision by the ECHR on Article 6 ECHR and 13 states in the tenor, that an effective legal remedy against abuse of rights and equitable relief for compliance with the law on due process in the brd not exist! Translated into simple terms this means that the so-called "Federal Republic of Germany" is not quite effective rule of law!
It can thus be impossible to deny: the judiciary is actually stronger than the right, she bends the law with might and thus unquestionable right to their known Entitled "Rechtsbeugermafia. The
brd, especially the judiciary is stronger because it is united in the fight against the law and fight for the injustice. And what about the victims justice / justice critics?
Among the critics, there are Catholics, Protestants, atheists, etc., there are "left" and "rights", etc. Even for differences in beliefs, political views, if private likes and dislikes, etc. Justice critic does not normally work together, but usually even to today. As an atheist, they are pleased about the exclusion of Catholics as "left" one looks forward to the elimination of "rights", and often pays homage to this even a Dürrenmatt-justice: It does not matter if someone is convicted, rightly or wrongly, the main thing, he is convicted.
And even more problematic: Some judges consider the brd statutory authority acting carrier, others regard brd judges mere private persons without any legitimacy. Depending on the position of course has implications for how we deal with the problem brd.
But even when things are larger concentrations of judicial critics, then come here usually only a few completely unobtrusive, rather ridiculous "demonstrations" about, read about the not even in the local section of the associated small-town press, a note is. The judiciary have no critics Batons and no tear gas, and they have (well, probably mostly) and certainly not the interest, others to break the nose and inflicting a skull-brain trauma. They withdraw, while the brd with bestial cruelty strikes on them.
In addition: Anyone who stands up for other stops, so that even his own head. In a specific case anyone was convicted of criticism of the abortion innocent to 50 days. A disinterested third party, criticized this judicial crime and it was then himself innocent sentenced to 60 days. Who is already known for his own cases harassed by the brd that quickly passes the wish to learn because of solidarity with other victims brd additionally the oppressed.
Here one could begin only if at least would be the interest of justice in the foreground. This means: You would have to reject injustice even if it was to meet someone whose views are not dividing, or even rejects it. A Catholic would also be used for a Hitler-admirer may, in the event that the Hitler-admirer happens to manifest injustice. And if you judge the brd now for governmental official shall be arbitrary or harassing individuals sees that this tangible injustice can be branded in any case as an injustice, regardless of the further steps that we deem suitable for contrast. One might also consider why in the parable of the unjust judge has complied with the request of the widow (Luke 18,1-8). As long as everyone laments
only his own misfortune, possibly even with glee at the injustice suffered by third parties and is watching everyone else out of the way confrontation, is the judiciary stronger. Man himself is, however, still have to answer for the strength of brutal justice, in one way or another.
0 comments:
Post a Comment