see you, Mr.
crime writer Schmiester ,
unfortunately, only what they want. Rarely have I seen
that a person's own fears and contradictions transfers so vehemently to another person. But they are happens to be the Old Left, which I can count I suppose you because you not only left but also are a bit older already (The DOORS are no longer No. 1 on the Single - Charts ) , so they are, the Old Left: return to place its own house, where still lying around the Muff of a thousand years, of course, turned beautifully to the door, because there is yes then the problem of others, scapegoats are sought to be happy times for everything can be blamed, what it will match not just in our own stuff. And if that scapegoat is found only once, takes the Old Left of the ultimate liberation, to soothe his own conscience: he denounced his opponent as a Nazi.
Dear crime writer Schmiester , in a world in which even Ralph Giordano and Henryk Broder M. are called Nazis, gets the term "Nazi" almost something ennobling. Therefore, the Nazis now makes your arguments, so we want to call it that.
you say I would spread fear, irrational fear even. Sure, the regular bombing of Israel are pure fantasy. The 11th September, a plot of the Americans. In Spain, never a train was blown up. And Heathrow never had a terror alert. You know, Mr. crime writer Schmiester , talk like Helmut Kohl in the early 90's, when Germany had again pogroms homes burned and asylum seekers. Despite the attacks in Rostock and Hoyerswerda and the dull roaring crowd at the roadside, Helmut Kohl claimed I seriously there would be no fundamental problem with right-wing violence in Germany. He settled on no demo, look no funeral and no mourning event. Germany had no problem and who it claimed stoked the fear.
you sound also like the politicians who claimed that the speeches of No - Go - Areas for foreigners during the 2006 World Cup in Germany was pure panic. Sun fascistic motivated crimes are talking small, and those damned who dare to call attention.
course, the fears for it irrational. What do you have to worry about already? You actually are sitting in safety. If you are not a gay Palestinian, who risks the death. You are not emancipated woman shortly before stoning. You are not a Jew who hated , is because he is a Jew. They are a good German petty bourgeoisie, which is now synonymous with comically old leftist. You have a very different fear, a fear is not irrational. You want to lose your security not just keep quiet, without notice, do not put your finger in the wound. Of us want to anything. We have the so alone. And in the end we know nothing about .
Tell me, Mr. Crime author Schmiester have, because you made in your old time, never left a Christian Left? The you would have to read it Bonhöfer , right? Now that this is probably never happen, I would like to make up for it here:
"First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist, so I did not speak. Then they came for the homosexuals, but I was not a homosexual, and so I did not speak. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak. Then they came for the Catholics, but I was not a Catholic, so I did not speak. When they came for me, was no more there who could protest. "
As long as there have except the Islamic fundamentalists only on Muslims (Muslims are happens to be the main victims group of Islamic fundamentalists) as long as they only hate the Jews (and there are always reasons to have them as Old Left certainly a few "good reasons" on the way) as long as they stone women only (which is anyway a different culture, because we can not, therefore, are arrogant and prevent them) as long as the bombs go off only in the U.S., England and Spain (and something must have indeed committed a crime, just as the Jews, who are not entirely to blame for their suffering - jaja , we know the keyboard ), while the war is the war of the others, then, as long as the others die, we simply declare the peace in private for us. Congratulations again, Mr. crime writer Schmiester , you have privatized the peace, and all the other German-gooders. No war nowhere yesterday was that enough for your front yard. And anyone who dares to point out that just may cause this position to the contrary, a BILD-readers, Nazi, Schäublefan (? What must it be today)
Mr. crime writer Schmiester , They like your Butze may not remember, but it is not peace. People are killed because they have the wrong gender, because they are Jews, because they fuck the wrong - even in Germany, as the topic proves "honor" murder . Because we can not just say that it does not affect us;. Although it may quite well read as I can. For them, the Islamic terrorist is in fact no danger, but a snap idea of Schäuble . Chapeau . You have to come finally fitted.
What should I do so in your opinion? Should I see your face, such as Helmut Kohl ren once in the 90 ? Shall I real danger of the terrorism conceal, as we almost do not collectively during the World Cup were allowed to speak on racism in Germany without denounced as traitors to be?
Mr. crime writer Schmiester listen to you, to seek Nazis, where there are none. Come out of your sandbox in the good old 70's out and put away the molds . Out there in the world there are just a blow to the Femi - and humanism, a development that is disgusting. Anti-Semitism to Zionism Anti , Antiamerkanismus is acceptable, "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion "are now called" Israel Lobby, "Women's rights must not be taken by UN Member States, sexist Comedy is back in. We have a problem: We have the Enlightenment damn grown!
But you see the obviously different. You think I would abet xenophobia. Of course, you criticize my work. There you are again safe and fear nothing. Criticism of my work is as easy as criticism of Schäuble, the U.S. and Israel. We will not blow up or some people against you fanatisieren . The embassies of the world are safe from us. And flags I will not burn. Since I have no money. To criticize me and my work, so you do not chutzpah. With me you get ahead with insinuations.
For I have never said that all Mulsime are terrorists. In my play only terrorist is the one that occurs a Muslim. Is that likely? No. Is it scaremongering? Hardly. Otherwise, should not a theater showing a neo-Nazi with a bald head, bald head yes as the carrier may discriminate. And the rapist on stage may not be a man anymore, or indeed anyone else would dream of all men are rapists . Marlene Dietrich And of course, was a traitor to his country as it in the 2nd World War II has been on the side of the Allies . It's amazing how a reactionary old leftist can be.
Again for you, Mr. crime writer Schmiester : Almost all rapists are men. This does not mean that all men are rapists . It is the same with terrorism. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but alarmingly many terrorists are Muslims. Even Alice in Wonderland understands this, and again: the main victims of the terrorists are Muslims. The idea is for this Muslims to speak. What about these victims? Should we remain silent just because it's the "Others"? What is also with Muslims who blow up is not that do not use their children as a shield? We do not offend the Muslims, if we are constantly looking for reasons why someone will Terrorist , instead of asking why the great majority of Muslims are not terrorists are? What is emancipated with the Muslims? Are we to them in the back, because we find it easy exciting to analyze the perpetrators. How brazen can you actually still spit on enlightened Muslims.
Your letter reflects a certain inability to . Mourn Rather than admit the fact that the play "brains on the beach" mainly concerned with the victims' perspective, they want to balance at all costs. Why do we always understand the perpetrators? What is there to understand? The terror spread terror. This terror is spreading all the more so as people, how to prevent it, watch the terror in his eyes. Only those who dare to call to mind the horrors, can be protected against, the victim of his own fear of being.
me to make, I would say that every foreign culture man is a danger. This is not true, you want to see it that way. Do you happen to own fear of the unknown? Have you maybe too busy with the perpetrators? Too much analysis of his feelings? Him too much "understood"? How about real openness compared with the cultures. Each culture holds humanistic, feminist and democratic structures. Be they appear open to these structures, no matter what culture it. However, be wary of those people you will then make an enemy, there are not few. In the end, the terrorists are among us. Sometimes they set fire to asylum homes, synagogues, even the World Trade Center . There is no excuse. And I'm not tired to complain, no matter whether the murderer of white, black, gay, lesbian, male, female, Jew, Christian, Buddhist , or Muslim. And the enlightened man will be in my opinion, as long as it considers the ideals of the Enlightenment as more important than "cultural characteristics".
a terrorist in a play a Palestinian scarf turn depend is just as legitimate as to give a soldier in Iraq a U.S. uniform. Who is not allowed, or equal believes stood behind evil intentions, is a notorious, paranoid alls.
remain in that sense, I with the best wishes of a know to better knowledge,
gerd Buurmann
PS. The terrorist has not spoken in Hebrew by the way, as you claim it in your letter, but Arabic. For you, this will however make no difference. But to be able to differentiate your ability to be registered always doubt since your last letter. Instead of judging PAGE reader, download a reader such but just to take a tea. You can then play quietly DOORS .
0 comments:
Post a Comment