Thursday, October 16, 2008

How Mini Projectors Work

The club

and how it was discovered.

On 11 October 1998 was made in Frankfurt am Main, one of the most important discoveries in the history of Germany. In general enthusiasm grub from Dr. Martin Walser in St. Paul's Church, the Auschwitz cudgel. Since this discovery, which is equal in importance the discovery of Troy in nothing, the Auschwitz leg of a triumphal march through Germany has begun. Today, ten years later, it is hardly a person in Germany who is afraid that before this leg of Auschwitz. What ten years ago in Walsh's words, even the sound: "Auschwitz is not suitable for a tool of becoming, be applicable intimidation or a moral cudgel", sounds like today with the TAZ reporter Bodemann as follows: "Especially in Germany, the anti-Semitism charge be fatal, so beware of many Jews and non-Jews in front to open his mouth. "

Auschwitz The club has won! Everywhere in Germany be prevented from sitting desperate people who would like to say something critical, for example, against Israel, but because of them floating over Auschwitz leg it. Silenced million citizens sitting in their German exiles living room and have no way of hearing the truth. Germany is a country held in bondage, in which Israel must not be criticized and is stifling any form of criticism of the political exploitation of the Holocaust, even and especially by the Jews in Germany and around the world in the bud. In every newspaper Germany are also small indication of political transgressions of Israel and Norman Finkelstein's book "The Holocaust Industry" in Germany is de facto not be purchased.

Stop!
stopped!
Oops!

At least now there is a need to scream this world become famous German words, but this time to point out facts.

The nightmare scenario just described, there is not, on the contrary, criticism of Israel is found in every German newspaper and not just occasionally, but really almost daily. The fear of the population in Israel is not very high, but it is also loud and well-articulated loudly. 65% of Germans said, according to a release by the TIME on 04/11/2003 EU survey that Israel constitutes the greatest threat to world peace. The newspapers are also to not to reprint the letters with israel-critical content and Norman Finelstein is invited to the prime time to Sabine Christiansen, during his book in the bestseller lists in Germany at least as fast climb to the top, as will the book "The Israel Lobby" by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, in which it is claimed that it had done no lobbying else, U.S. foreign policy to divert as much of the national interest, while controlling the political issues and criticism of Israel to silence.

The summary for the "Israel Lobby" does Traderjob in character on "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" (c. 1900), an anti-Semitic diatribe, part of the standard reading of each guild anti-Semites. But will this Urfaust anti-chen thought a bit further and makes the Jews for all sorts of responsible, for example for democracy, liberalism, all economic crises, wars, revolutions, and of course anti-Semitism itself the allegation made in these protocols, is that the Jews would finance subway stations to be in the shafts to blow up bombs can This book is of course something more interesting than "The Israel Lobby", which is to explain that "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" as a TV series were shown, among other things in Egypt (2002) and Lebanon (2004), while in the Palestinian authorities in the 10th Grade is read, which in turn explains why the Hamas movement, which won the 2006 elections, has taken as a justification in its Charter in Article 32.

"The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" to be purchased commercially in Germany, though not as easy as, for example, "The Israel Lobby" or "The Holocaust Industry", are indeed found in all German non-fiction shelves in the category best seller. Want to read the logs have to exert a bit more. It was only a visit to the Frankfurt Book Fair is recommended. There was in 2005 at the state of Iran, the book touted in his State of the Islamic Propaganda Organization ", published version under the title" Jewish Conspiracy ".

To summarize: The German bookshelves spilling out of sheer criticism of Israel over the German people informed majority and regularly loud audible Israel, the letters to a critical report will be printed as a matter of course and people like Evelyn Hecht-Galinski who like to Israel Nazi Germany have to compare, in October 2008 by the 28th Civil Chamber of the Cologne District Court granted the right to say these things not only, but may also claim the right for the right to forbid others, they therefore called anti-Semites. Therefore is no longer the problem of anti-Semitism in Germany, but anti-Semitism accusation. An almost exemplary Salto Teutonale that led to the fact that the majority of Germans are firmly convinced to be muzzled while in reality other muzzles.

The list of people who nobody knows, because they are silenced, by the way long. Noam Chomsky, for example, in Germany, practically nobody knows! Finkelstein his books in Germany is not going on. Felicia Langer is almost never invited, and the poems by Erich Fried reads in German lands not human. With shivering and shaking because you want to ask: If this is the German are screaming, what happened only after the Germans are chatty? been

One feels in Germany as a country while asserting that seven out of ten people, kidnapped recently from a ship to be. But instead of these seven idiots just to send the next Nina Hagen concert to play on the Feuilltonschefs the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and the Süddeutsche Zeitung on the Robin Hoods of the opinion Sent computing Teten and throw themselves fearlessly between the letter writers Auschwitz and the club.

That leaves the question of who she swings eingentlich, this leg of Auschwitz? Stupid question. The answer has already given us "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion". The Jew of course. He swings the club and Auschwitz itself is to blame for the anti-Semitism! The knew Grandpa and his sons and grandchildren there to talk to him cheerfully. Taste? Certainly. said in a ZDF interview from 2003 Jürgen Möllemann, who was a few weeks later to speak with the sentence "Today I make my single star," his last words:

"I am afraid that no one anti-Semites, which in Germany unfortunately, and we are fighting need, has given more crowds than Mr Sharon and in Germany a Mr. Friedman with his intolerant and spiteful way arrogant. This is not like that, you may have to practice in Germany, criticism of the policies of Sharon, without being pushed into this corner. "

It has to go but not only to Israel, so someone a Jew expresses the Auschwitz cudgel in hand, only to then throw in front of him on the floor, moaning about "do not hit!" to call to his girlfriend finally sees what kind of an asshole but this Jew.

In a debate about the construction of a Jewish museum in the old town of Cologne, turned himself in July 2008, the chief editor of the Cologne Gazette Franz Sommerfeld into the conversation turned and prominent page of his newspaper that: "Any attempt to immunize urban planning decisions by reference to the German debt to criticism, which plays into the hands that qualify, the extermination of the Jews and speculate on anti-Semitic reflexes. "The problem was that nobody had been shown (not even a Jew!) involved in this initiative. But what the heck. Ten years after the excavation of the Auschwitz leg by Dr. Martin Walser in St. Paul's Church in Frankfurt am Main is the club in the German exiles living there arrived and spread fear, terror and, above all, a cross around Offended.

behind any comparison with the Nazis, how justified or unjustified, he also may be, a personal insult is sensed. Each anti-Semitism accusation whether appropriate or not is the outrage of honor rejected out of hand. It is just as as though the German people that was once in St. Paul's Church, the Auschwitz leg, the power of the notorious Offended learned one of those Islamists who, on 30 had found September 2005, the Mohammed cartoons in the Danish Jyllands Posten. This power of the One Offended inspired fanatical Islamists worldwide protests, which were conducted so professionally, with flag burnings, violence and hundred dead, that one can only assume that those Islamists have learned this in turn by the Germans, pogroms. One hand washes containing the other. While fanatical Islamists

scent that is behind every criticism of Islam and after each test, give the Prophet the Prophet Mohammed a face, an insult which violates the honor of Islam, many see in Germany behind every criticism of anti-Semitism and after each experiment, the to give anti-Semitism through comparisons with the history of a face, the evil intention of insult and defamation. Thus, the burqa of silence that is in some countries of the world thrown on women, lest her beauty dulls the eyes of the horny men thrown over the German history, of course, honorable for the same reason, you want to prevent that the German blunts in dealing with the period of National Socialism. Goy

The German and the German shiksa familiarize yourself with this trick also victims of National Socialism and can discuss with the German Jews and German Jews finally on equal footing. At last, all are envious of victims in Germany and no one has more of a Jew for his Holocaust. Now have all suffered under the Nazis. In school, the new German Jungend is today and always constantly plagued with National Socialism. The history teacher in Germany deport virtually all students to visit several times in their lives to Dachau, to force them there, a camp. These young people will understandably so as to their trauma only overcome by repression and apathy, so it's not too surprising that almost ¼ of all pupils and students aged 14 to 17 years, according to a representative survey of Alphons Silbermann of 2000 have no idea what Auschwitz is.

saw in Germany, the urge for perfection just always have to overreact. The mass murder was finally perfected in Germany, and it ought to go down with the devil if there where the mass murder perfected was not dealing with the past of mass murder could be perfected, and it was then, was allowed to splash out just do not: The German terms with the past was and is in the execution perfect and the German, of course, proud - so proud that he had to overcome the past on export would prefer. Tirelessly tries to Verganenheitsbewältigung made in Germany to bring the nations of the world. Since the United States is blamed because it is not such a good example with the Indians deal, as the Germans with the Jews and Israel also receives tutoring in terms of ethnic reconciliation, because it can not really tackle it now, that not even the Jews something have learned from Auschwitz. But in Germany it is not as forgiving, on the contrary, is the generous German tuition.

This tutoring takes part in the most absurd forms. Unbeaten in the series of absurd German tuition by a remark of Dr. Martin Walser himself, who said after the discovery of Auschwitz club in St. Paul's Church, Ignatz Bubis, who dared him not to congratulate him on his excavations, "I've already the issue, because you were busy with other things. "This sentence you have to let one melt in your mouth.

Ignatz Bubis, who in 1944 held in forced labor camps and his father caught Czestochowa in the extermination camp Treblinka was killed and his brother and sister were destroyed by the Nazis, had to by Dr. Martin Walser, whose entry into the Nazi Party at 30 January 1944 falls and the end of the 2nd World War II as a soldier of the armed forces have experienced, say, how to deal with the Holocaust - and at that time was the Auschwitz leg just found.

Today, ten years later, the Auschwitz leg integral part in people's minds become, in the German exiles living room. Let's see how it goes.

We should be excited.

Friday, September 12, 2008

Kate´s Playground Free Stream

Father Lingen: "Do not lie with the judiciary, we are stronger!"

"Do not lie with the judiciary, we are stronger!" Submitted by Father
Lingen on Thu, 2008-09-11 08:31.

"Do not lie with the judiciary, we are stronger!"


This has the word brd now-literally and publicly declared. This explicitly acknowledges the brd to Darling as the maxim: The law is not founded on truth, but there is simply the law of the jungle, the "law of the jungle" (cf. English Faust Law = law of the jungle). In that sense, the term "legal jungle" of brd actually a much deeper meaning.

The context of these self-brd revelation was the well-known show trial against the SA Regensburg Rüdiger Jung (2 KL 107 Js 12915/2007). Here are just a guide only: Rüdiger Jung had advocated that judges are to uphold the law are generally respected and that the abuses of the fixed brd. The success of Jung's efforts: young has long been deprived of time in the closed psychiatric his freedom and Zyprexa fully pumped (added effects: drowsiness, obesity, liver dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, dizziness, constipation, extrapyramidal disorder (impaired coordination of movements), etc .). Now Jung has incapacitated, although now free floating, but must continue to swallow Zyprexa. The Federal Court granted the young one case in March 2008: The ruling can briefing "do not have a stock, a legally viable reasons for a placement order will not be excluded." The Supreme Court of the maxim is so brd: First time destroy the ruthless critic, like with compulsory admission and "psychotropic drugs", a justification is unnecessary, because she might perhaps be found some day.
The handling of brd with those telling the truth and stand up for justice, is always basically the same. The Munich Lawyer Rolf Bossi (author of "demi-gods in Black") took exception to the "cronyism" in the judiciary and the camaraderie has not been turned off, but at least Bossi was sentenced for his remark to 12,000 euro fine. The journalist Juergen Roth (author of "The Germany-Clan - The network of unscrupulous politicians, top managers and Justice") took exception to the "rule of justice" in Saxony. The rule of justice has not been turned off, but still being waged against Roth now a criminal conviction for "insulting the state". The list of cases of this nature is endless. The targeted destruction of freedom of expression has become even a brd judge as patron: Andreas Buske (LG Hamburg) is the quintessential "Buskeismus.
admit To be fair, that the brd not always punished as draconian. Although, any legitimate criticism of evil, injurious to the public grievances are now available as "insulting", "insulting the state", "sedition" etc. punished. But one can defend anyway, especially because contains the "offense clause" § 185 StGB no certainty, so he acc. Article 103 GG / § 1 StGB / Article 7 of the ECHR is purely illegal and therefore null and void. That means you can not prove that it did not infringe the § 185 of the Criminal Code because it contains no definition, therefore, the arbitrariness of the brd is absolutely limitless. And the need brd so not even their victims to prove a debt, see all the cases have proven to judge which condemned the innocent intent. The judiciary has absolutely nothing to offer as an accusation, it stands out with the completely opaque to the phrase "common knowledge" on. Now what clemency for "insulting offenses" relates to it is worth remembering that the brd "authorities" can prove myself every impunity with expletives and libel, see, eg, the presiding judge Schwill of "Landgericht Bonn," the impunity despite numerous criminal complaints all process viewer as "morons" insulted. The freedom to go even further brd-sensitive: Certainly, Innocents end up in prison, often for years. Not so with guilty: How was the end of May 2008, the Turk convicted Erdinc S., after a 44-year-old wrongly beaten into a coma and thus nursing care had in the Cologne district court judge Hans-Werner Riehe a free man, released from the courtroom. Riehe recognized the existence of the guilt of the offender, ordered him but only for an "anti-Agressionstraining. For this punishment has to be thankful probably because Riehe would indeed miss out on any punishment, and instead simply to quote from the Koran, such as: "When you meet unbelievers, slay them by their havoc among them a great slaughter, and moves the chains of prisoners tightly together "(47th sura, verse 4) As a reminder. A German-Moroccan had applied iJ 2007 in Frankfurt, the divorce because she was beaten by her husband and threatened with murder but the so-called Koranic judge of the district court. rejected: "This [Moroccan] culture, it is not unusual that the man does in respect of the woman a right to punish. This was to be expected, who was born in Germany applicant when she married grew up in Morocco defendant "By the way. Meanwhile, against Erdinc S. A new method opens up, because he reportedly said on June 23 struck without reason on a passerby and Riehen. is not always so reluctant to Criminal Round: Against a rapporteur (DCRS) on this Riehe Rating Riehe has even filed a complaint. So serious violent crime may still be okay, but there is no mercy for legitimate and necessary reports on the judiciary.
The general findings on the state of brd-Justice are generally rather disappointing. Known is the word of "Federal Constitutional Court" retired Prof. Willi Geiger: "In Germany you can, instead of leading a process, as well roll the dice" (German newspaper Richter, 9 / 1982, p. 325). However, it would be a fatal belittlement when you thought it would be easy only incompetence and lack of interest in the judge caste. For as incompetent, and - in terms of the case - disinterested brd judges always be like one hand there are very basic rules that even with rough edge incompetence can not be overlooked, and on the other hand, have judges quite a fanatical interest: just out to destroy justice and to create injustice. Protect the crime - punish the righteous! This is the maxim of the iron brd Justice.
Think also of the public statement of ex-Judge Frank Fahsel (SZ, 02:04:08): I countless judges, prosecutors, and prosecutors have had to experience that one can simply "criminal" call. [...] I have ... ... just incredible how numerous, the system organized breaches of the law and legal inflections seen not to cope with the was / is because they conform to the system, "added As Prof. Dr. Hans-Joachim Selenz." Best way to the state in parts of the German judiciary is get to the point that abuse by means of which political and economic rule of law. [...] explicitly criminal justice activities abound. [...] The bottom includes the highest German courts. Therefore, there is virtually no conviction for violation of the law, obstruction of justice in office and advantage ". See further the article in Der Spiegel ("Maischberger of miscarriage of justice", 28.05.08): "The judiciary is controlled themselves by has set up a chain of command that runs from the District Court of the District Court and the Court of Appeal to the Federal Court and the Constitutional Court. But God help the man who embarks on this path. His prospects, for Michael to be Kohlhaas are larger than this, that it justice is done. "
And in a review of the latest book by Prof. Hans Herbert von Arnim (the Germany Act. What do to politicians and business leaders of our country) summarizes the TV station 3sat (culture time, 15.05.2008) the situation in our country this succinctly as follows: ". Our system is - in good German - in the ass"
The system can hold, therefore, only in that it any change for the better immediately nipped in the bud, so it lives by the death of the righteous. Just how we, as one can see from videos of graswurzel.tv (gegenstrom08: cast power plant construction site Moorburg Hamburg, 23.08.2008). Go to the video it says on the grassroots website: "After we filmed the thrashing officials did this purposefully to our cameraman and snatched him his press card was then stamped on him with batons and fists, neither service nor train was us about this.. officials reported. " has
What are the prospects of the citizens to take action against offenders brd, shows also the article "The colleague helps. More and commit crimes again in the Berlin police Service. Sued them for it almost never ", Jungle World, 18.12.2002. It is Ö includes well-known case of Levent. Presented, the four police officers an open nasal fracture, a skull-brain trauma and other injuries to her in any way unauthorized intrusion in his home inflicted. Levent Ö. thanks to the fearless use of brd permanently incapacitated. He filed a criminal complaint for assault, which led in fact to criminal proceedings, uz Ö against Levent. because of "resistance against the state".
How safe is against violence in Germany, it can - albeit muted - and the victim of torture, murder in the JVA Siegburg testify for the result of this. two-hour orgy of torture, so the death of the victim, it is immaterial whether the prison guards simply looked the subtle - perhaps even more consuming beer and chips - have been watching them on.
Still, the vast majority of Germans do not seek truth and justice, but the superstar, the perfect dinner, the gate of the month, etc., and as such remain largely undisturbed, except for containing what the other disadvantages of the concerns brd with mass unemployment, mass poverty, mass stupidity, etc. Maybe you lose even a relative who is abroad on illegal wars of aggression involved in the FRG, but otherwise it's the Germans actually quite good.
And to the little judicial overview here include: The European Court of Human Rights [ECHR] has 75529/01 ECHR judgments on 08.06.2006 stated that violations of human rights under Article 6 and 13 in the MRK brd. This decision by the ECHR on Article 6 ECHR and 13 states in the tenor, that an effective legal remedy against abuse of rights and equitable relief for compliance with the law on due process in the brd not exist! Translated into simple terms this means that the so-called "Federal Republic of Germany" is not quite effective rule of law!
It can thus be impossible to deny: the judiciary is actually stronger than the right, she bends the law with might and thus unquestionable right to their known Entitled "Rechtsbeugermafia. The
brd, especially the judiciary is stronger because it is united in the fight against the law and fight for the injustice. And what about the victims justice / justice critics?
Among the critics, there are Catholics, Protestants, atheists, etc., there are "left" and "rights", etc. Even for differences in beliefs, political views, if private likes and dislikes, etc. Justice critic does not normally work together, but usually even to today. As an atheist, they are pleased about the exclusion of Catholics as "left" one looks forward to the elimination of "rights", and often pays homage to this even a Dürrenmatt-justice: It does not matter if someone is convicted, rightly or wrongly, the main thing, he is convicted.
And even more problematic: Some judges consider the brd statutory authority acting carrier, others regard brd judges mere private persons without any legitimacy. Depending on the position of course has implications for how we deal with the problem brd.
But even when things are larger concentrations of judicial critics, then come here usually only a few completely unobtrusive, rather ridiculous "demonstrations" about, read about the not even in the local section of the associated small-town press, a note is. The judiciary have no critics Batons and no tear gas, and they have (well, probably mostly) and certainly not the interest, others to break the nose and inflicting a skull-brain trauma. They withdraw, while the brd with bestial cruelty strikes on them.
In addition: Anyone who stands up for other stops, so that even his own head. In a specific case anyone was convicted of criticism of the abortion innocent to 50 days. A disinterested third party, criticized this judicial crime and it was then himself innocent sentenced to 60 days. Who is already known for his own cases harassed by the brd that quickly passes the wish to learn because of solidarity with other victims brd additionally the oppressed.
Here one could begin only if at least would be the interest of justice in the foreground. This means: You would have to reject injustice even if it was to meet someone whose views are not dividing, or even rejects it. A Catholic would also be used for a Hitler-admirer may, in the event that the Hitler-admirer happens to manifest injustice. And if you judge the brd now for governmental official shall be arbitrary or harassing individuals sees that this tangible injustice can be branded in any case as an injustice, regardless of the further steps that we deem suitable for contrast. One might also consider why in the parable of the unjust judge has complied with the request of the widow (Luke 18,1-8). As long as everyone laments
only his own misfortune, possibly even with glee at the injustice suffered by third parties and is watching everyone else out of the way confrontation, is the judiciary stronger. Man himself is, however, still have to answer for the strength of brutal justice, in one way or another.

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Why Do Belt Loops Rip

Falk von Helsing The Jura-loser Manual

Infected Rookpiercing?

in "The lie of the lawyers': Is justice a matter of luck?





law has rarely what it promises. It depends on people, and can make mistakes. How much and how often, Rolf Lamprecht told SPIEGEL as observers at the supreme courts. He tells of arbitrariness, of injustice - and courageous plaintiffs who are driven by their sense of justice, to fight to the highest authorities. An old, but enduring slogan says, everyone was in court and on the high seas in the hands of God. The quote is reminiscent of the irrational forces that are inherent to the law - the resemblance to a game of chance. Alone that it is often from instance instance completely opposite opinions are, demonstrates the relativity of the law. ended as that of a family judge, whose own marriage with a divorce battle - also of interest. Whether it conflicts with the government or by private feuds for paternity tests or for euthanasia is - Lamprecht allows the reader to participate in the production of law. This is so special about this book. It explains why law is only the sum of many partial truths, how is it made - and then passes. And it reveals what judges are able to afford to fail and where they need to.

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Something Funny To Say In A Get Well Soon Card

Rolf Bossi - demigods in black

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Arctic Cat Led Lights For Snowmobile

From predicate lawyers for the precarious-lawyers - the rise of a descent was.

<br /> absurd - from lawyers for the predicate-precarious-lawyers - the rise of a descent was.

From predicate lawyers for the precarious-lawyers - the rise of a descent was.



]
associations criticize judges salaries of judges and prosecutors as inadequate

Criticism of the system of remuneration of judges and prosecutors louder. grade experts of the German Judges Association (DRB) and the German Federal Administrative Court and administrative judges (BDVR) are independently come to the conclusion that the pay of the judiciary is no longer within the constitutionally prescribed Alimentation think. The judges see themselves confirmed in a report by the management consultants Kienbaum. The Federal Constitutional Court has repeatedly held that the Richteralimentation the special importance of the Office had to take into account share with the judges' associations. This requires constitutional imperative that the judiciary the responsibility associated with the Office and of the development of economic Conditions and living standards is to provide an adequate livelihood,
BDVR said board chairman Chris Heydemann on 18/08/2008. [...]




unsatisfactory grade - the predicate lawyer starts but only at fully satisfactory ...


you can do an already suffering, the German judges and prosecutors, to the envy of the world.


The work stop here out of pure idealism for an Ipod and an egg, with just above R1 or Hartz IV ALG II and thus on the edge - not only of a nervous breakdown, no, the
constitution.


According to the federal earned a salary of
R1-Richter/Staatsanwalt, 37 years without children, including all special payments, according to reports in 2002 about 49 130 € and in 2007 approximately 47 820 €.


If we as Stark, aka "Shark," looks at Monday VOX ... . But that's just "fiction". As it moves smoothly Discovered attorney to the prosecutor - only because he believed that he had to do something good to
.


We find that the people to whose name goes here, has a right to know this position paper in all its plain language and to know German judges deserve what
udn prosecutors. Everything - except for (our) ridicule.


We support this completely and without any restriction, so that might be fulfilled what promised us our social studies teacher once, as Moses the Iraeliten geobte the country: the rule of law.


The German people is called ... .


For those who want to hang it somewhere, so they see it at least once a day until then, here the PDF file directly from the DRB and DVRB.


position paper on the remuneration and pensions of judges and prosecutors


Every citizen is entitled to an effective judiciary, which effectively achieved justice and legal certainty. This includes an adequate remuneration of the judiciary. The Federation of German administrative courts and administrative judges (BDVR) and the German Association of Judges (DRB) are calling on federal and state governments to carry out a constitutional system of remuneration and pensions of the judiciary, of the principles of independence

and national unity of the remuneration of judges and prosecutors ( R-grade starting) and to be made in respect of third party violence.

• The amount of the current R-grade in Germany was no longer meets the basic legal requirements and is therefore unconstitutional.


• In view of the new regulations due, we consider it as necessary to reach a legally completely separate salary and supply for judges and prosecutors. Both matters are in future to settle outside the civil service law.

• As a result of the transfer of statutory powers with regard to the R-grades to the states - while preserving the jurisdiction of the federal government for federal judges and federal prosecutors - are already registered now completely different trends in salary to

. As for the judicial prosecutor working in Germany and are all the same requirements must also insist same salary structures for all judges and prosecutors. We therefore call to return to the consistency of the R-grade.

• All efforts to vary by so-called performance-based elements of their remuneration, we issue a denial. A higher salary of a judge or a judge shall be subject only to an associated with higher responsibility of judgment
.

Any other form of Zusatzalimentierung opens the door to a possible influence on executive of judicial activity by financial reward or the absence thereof. In the discretionary special benefits to judges and prosecutors with the judicial independence and to agree not to the legislative mandate of the Prosecutor "



interjection.

To make it even more clearly to do: not judges and prosecutors may help out just that easily at the beer stand at the Moselle hard as easy as 400 EURO-base

yet further:..

The Basic Law guarantees the independence of judges Their objective and personal independence is necessary for the judiciary - in the context of the constitutional separation of powers - the incumbent to fulfill its task of case law.

It corresponds to the jurisdiction of the Federal Constitutional Court, that the independence of the judge needs to be made by his salary. His Alimentation has to reflect the specific meaning of the judicial office into account. This requires constitutional imperative that the judge is on the responsibility associated with the Office and of the development of economic conditions and living standards to provide a reasonable living. The masters at the federal and countries are therefore required to dimension the salaries of the judge so that they are adequate.

The adequacy of the salaries and benefits after the constitutional law of very considerable importance for the maintenance of judicial independence. Also provides an adequate judges grade the condition

that the necessary services for the judges highly qualified lawyers can be obtained.

After the scope and importance of the prosecutor's position within the prosecutors of the judicial office as a Judge is to understand the like. It is a force equal to the third and associated with controlling the administration of justice, they met in
criminal law with the courts the task of providing justice.

terms of the constitutional requirements, the Alimentation of German judges and prosecutors for years no longer sufficient.

The current situation is partly characterized by massive legislative interventions into the existing structure of salaries and pensions at the expense of judges and prosecutors, they also detrimental by actual developments.

In this context are:


• Necessary adjustments to the salaries have been moved since 1997 and over again. lower - - input stages created

• In the R-grade two were.

• The recognition of higher education time was limited.


to form a reserve supply reductions have been made to pay and supply adjustments.

• The maximum pension of 75% was reduced to 71,75%.


• The widow's pension was reduced from 60% to 55%.

• The Christmas bonus (special allowance or payment) was drastically reduced or eliminated altogether.

• The holiday pay was deleted.

• Between 2005 and 2006, partly in 2007 are even
no adjustments to remuneration and pensions have been made more

.

• In the period 1992 to 2007, the salaries of judges and prosecutors in total only increased by about 20% - in the countries with complete loss of the Christmas bonus even less - while the price index has increased in this period by 32%. Compared to the price increases have lagged behind the salaries on average by almost 40%.

• The increase in VAT from 16% to 19% leads to a further indirect income loss because they - Is not offset by security reductions elsewhere - in contrast to social insurance contributions.

• Compared with similar groups in industry is the development of the R-grade far behind. Thus, in trade, credit and insurance industry from 1992 to 2005 recorded an income increase of 46%, and the film is twice as high as in the - behind the price increases remaining - R-grade.

• The expenses are for salaries to be financed from the state aid compliant health insurance increased 1993-2003 by an average of almost 70%. This led to a significant reduction in the other for the support available
salary amounts.

• In addition, the share of benefit payments have been reduced. In particular, the judges and prosecutors uninsurable deductibles were imposed in cases of illness.

• Judges and prosecutors for years in order to renew their salaries significantly worse than the rate for public sector workers.


beneficiaries pay benefits for specific groups of officials were not or not fully apply to the judiciary. Through the implementation of non-proportional Remuneration policies in the past, the distance requirement has been violated several times.

• By European standards, the German move salaries for judges at the bottom.

• Particularly serious was the treatment of child-rich families judges by the legislature. Since 1998 until very recently, the Order of the Federal Constitutional Court have not been endorsed to provide for constitutional officers and judges Alimentation of families with more than two children.

This non-exhaustive list shows that the remuneration and pensions of judges and prosecutors in Germany, especially from restrictions was affected and was disconnected from the overall economic development both in national and European level. Judges currently provide an unreliable sacrifices.

The design of the R-grade but may have, for constitutional reasons not dependent on the cash position will be made. Apart from this, the total income from federal and state governments have in the years 2007 and 2008 compared to the preceding period improved significantly, without this the law has led to federal and to a reduction of salaries and pensions cuts.

from the employer owed alimentation is not the extent of its variable size that can be easily on the economic possibilities of the public or political opinions can be measured
urgency. Remuneration and pensions of judges are not saving potential of federal and state governments. Rather, the official measure of adequate payment, the development of general economic and social conditions and the general standard of living. By these standards, the remuneration and pensions of judges and prosecutors is not compatible with the Constitution. This constitutional violation must be removed urgently.
Even the respect of the judicial dictates that the necessary arrangements be made promptly and adequately.

an unaltered grade position also leads to a loss of competitiveness of the judiciary when it comes to attracting highly qualified lawyers for the Judicial Service.


The company needs now more than ever responsible, motivated, professionally and socially competent personalities in the judiciary. It is for the service men in federal and state governments to create the necessary framework for it. This obviously includes the provision of adequate salaries.

II

We therefore expect not only that the constitutionally required Mindestalimentation the judge and prosecutors in Germany are finally paid back, can but that the R-grade in total increased significantly, including expectations of future inflation for the past few years, and on adapting to the professional development of comparable income groups outside the public service
so that they can withstand a European comparison.
The judicial function is to be recognized. The value society attaches to reflect in the amount of the R-grade.

This requires a restructuring through only for judges and prosecutors applicable laws alone commanded.

If the previous legal concept of joint control of civil servants and judges receive salary is, for Alimentation the activity in the Third violence according to their nature and importance of adequately evaluated. The salary for the previous grade R 1 must therefore be raised to an imbalance with respect to the payment of administrators back in balance in the final stage. On this basis, the R-grade considering the distance from transport offices bid is to be established.

is in terms of Alimentation child-rich judges families to point out that the demand calculation for third and additional children after the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court in 1998 of at least 115% of the average social welfare overall legal requirements must base. This is the constitutionally absolute minimum. The legislators should be child-rich families, however, judges do not explain the social welfare legal requirements at the material basis of calculation. Because judges are to pay alimony according to their position as representatives of the independent third party violence. This also includes their families.
regard, it is unacceptable, the judges of child-rich families Alimentation because of increased needs only to align the rate of welfare.


III.

judges and prosecutors in Germany do a good job. You have a right to have this reflected in their pay. Therefore, have the DRB and the BDVR
decided to issue this joint statement.

The BDVR held back in the past with statements consciously BesoldungsundVersorgungsfragen. This was also done in the knowledge that have to decide on issues in this regard administrative judge. He gives his reticence with the position paper to understand because the judicial colleagues and the pain level is now reached.

Berlin, August 2008


signed by Dr. Chris Heydemann, signed by Christopher Frank,

Chairman BDVR the Chairman of the DRB

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Free Vlad Model Clips

Auschwitz, victims, and Biedermeier

Not that I do in the last few days,
most honored theater director Buurmann,
would have forgotten ...

... No, I am as my adversary and since you often enough, this second soul in my breast are (the fist did not know better) inclined constantly, so it is only the question of when is this expression of my affection. This expression but now (so you, because I just dropped confession concerning the affection and alterity, you mean I actually get shut his mouth again), this expression now as a written entering my hand on your sway and switching and the desperate efforts of this to justify action, this expression also (ELN) of my involvement in your work is not content in apologetic Beifallsgeklatsche - What you, as far as I know you well enough now, yes, certainly much rather be: basking in the applause of admirers and groupies who forget their devotion to the detriment of their minds that have lost or abandoned. No, my affection, my inlets, theater director Buurmann is always in its expression or that of friend, mentor, with the intention to improve, helping to enrich.

Now we must therefore assume the hermeneutics, as defined under the blessed Aristotelis Begriffsverwirrrung the detriment of a general communication can not continue to exercise. I toss you, a theater director Buurmann me so before, fleeing to hermeneutics, if I give you the word offender within the meaning of our present understanding incorrectly used term alleges, as an identifier, which will not bow to your implications. Theater director Buurmann: No, not the hermeneutics raises objection here, I wanted to interpret any text or introduce you to the teaching of exegesis, only the changing meaning of the word I wanted perpetrators offer to show and felt so in the position of linguists. But they insist on "hermeneutics" if you thought me, with me reinzuwürgen assistant baiting and seeing me as an agitator in terms of offensive and defamatory language act, one and me against a flaneur (vs. Hetzer) play out looking. By creating Conceptual confusion, strolling through now - and not inclined to stroll around at all: the flowers along the way also! ! A beautiful metaphor, yes, Buurmann, you know this but my passions) -, your terms so arranging at leisure, I must tell you that like pendant meanings are not static, that meanings are changing so: in the pejorative sense, the So to have to whore whore, and in return, now every girl can find something cool feel without the parents or the youth office itself compelled to intervene. For this semantic change is needed now but no basic democratic vote, as you imagine it, it does not "meet between the language-gods and the people (...), was carved on which this interpretation for all eternity in stone ". Theater director Buurmann: Language changes, new creeps in is used over and eventually the significant Common - is that with the offender, according to the vernacular is always the gardener and that is to my knowledge always the murderer, that is follows logically: perpetrators = killers, on behalf of vox populi, who have never met.

you, a theater director Buurmann want to do their fighting for freedom of the Jewish people into perpetrators, and yes, I agree with all you said I'm with you Semite, Zionist and your students in this historical-political discourse, I'm on your side when you should use the terms you in terms of your understanding, this does not cover the usual and subsidiarity states, namely, to clarify and explicit in that regard. If you explain, then, that an offender is not for you is that, what does the mass of which, I can follow you, you can even call a table a chair and vice-versa, if you have told me that you need to sit and what need to eat. And glad I am to your philosophical digression on the subject of fact: "Every action brings forth new, (...), but destroyed any act also. With every deed we destroy the infinity of possibilities, "theater manager Buurmann, I had you quoted the Wallenstein, good fist - yes, the danger of the act. I have never denied and she is the perpetrator Sun warned as to his implied criminal intent award out, it must be given to consider also the agent, but in a much deeper philosophical meaning.

Honored Buurmann theater director, to be a German, you have accused me then and I will also still be in a typical sense. Now you are but who, because of the helter-skelter and rushes of the word double meaning true, you Hetzer! Well, you're already on your nose caught and penitent confessed to have been stupid, a stupid Hetzer. But how did you just point out that I was a typical German? I geschwennkt no banners by the German summer tale, I rejected the black, red and yellow flags jewelry for my window sill and the flag for the car - I would be just as bad flags outfitter for the ARD television studio before: whether red-black-yellow or yellow-black-red - Young Germany forgive myself, for my sake also speak the country in which my mother tongue, my flags aversion is rather due to the fact that the flags (mis) use of the typical German correlates with the passion for football so great! I find on the football field no passions, not in the stands, and certainly not in South curves, I see only mob and the desperate hanging on Poldi and Schweinis shirt tails, because the deprivation would they encounter elsewhere in the solitude and destroy - the Fan the prosaic to say the football is really the proverbial straw ...

From the depths of embarrassment you wanted to save himself trying with your apology to the accusation that I was a typical German, and a kowtow, I'll, theater director Buurmann, rich to the hand and will you also save them from a hara-kiri because you discovered an affinity for Biedermeier have, so if you were really in their self-conscious middle-class interior ambience of the early 19th century most comfortable? They did it (self-critical as rare) stuffy? They refer to in your self-criticism, theater director Buurmann, ie on the pejorative meaning of the Biedermeier period of the "flying leaves" of the 1850s, the "poems of the Gottlieb Biedermeier? They got out and touched by their petty-bourgeois Faibel even teary-eyed? Theater director Buurmann - here we are again the perpetrators or the incitement: Yes, Biedermann has come into disrepute and mutated into a simpleton, for simpletons, at the time but since this Civil Wohndekor arose that later became known as Biedermeier first, it was the revolutionary uprising against the nobility, the emerging bourgeoisie own the reasonable living culture should be opposed. - Buurmann theater director, I would imagine at times that you have received in light of your revolutionary roots moist eyes! Maintain but this nostalgic feeling and allow them to revive it with tears watered, but let the tears do not mean the loss and the knowledge that you have lost any revolutionary will. And you are a citizen, I recommend you read the issues between it and the artist in Thomas Mann - Yes, in "Tonio Kröger" of course.

The issue of fact in order to return once again, but yes your topic in the previously complained sand-bar of the brains. And whether because now your prepuce occurs or someone else if you have one or not, a theater director Buurmann, do me with such marginal notes not on the scrotum - the act or the perpetrator of your piece but I love coming back again.

Until then, then you
your always there to help
standing mystery writer Schmiester

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Best Pain Killer For A Fozen Shoulder

Typical German

's own nose, Mr.
crime writer Schmiester ,
is touched too often.

In my last letter I have you, well known in the impulse of literary-choleric attack, as a typical German. This insult I can not be left unchallenged. If I'm critical of myself am, I must confess that belonging to a state at all is an insult. Actually, it reveals more the existence of prejudice in my own, I too probably have problems with my German-ness. (This I'm probably the first truly German. Had not Heinrich Heine so many problems with Germany and loved it so much?) Well, the quarrel with their own country probably belongs to the German-ness.

am truly frightened about myself I, however, in Aachen. In Aachen, namely, the Couven Museum, which shows the bourgeois domestic culture of the past centuries. Each room was decorated in a bourgeois style of living. Well, guess what room I was most comfortable, yes almost like home. In the Biedermeier! Is not that narrow-minded! Yes, yes, the theater director gets in a Biedermeier kitchen moist eyes. What it's not all there.

your theater director Buurmann.

Monday, July 28, 2008

Drivers License Expiration And Army Service

of perpetrators and victims - a Wider word

If all else fails, Mr.
crime writer Schmiester ,
we flee to hermeneutics.

I would like to follow you to venture a few steps to hermeneutics, even if I fear not your speed to keep pace. Curb your speed so something, you will notice that there are some nice roadside flower, on the other you rush over. It missed a so many nice little things, when only one goal in mind, and forget about it all the way. I have always taken for a flaneur, a man of the strolls, and enjoys nothing. I regret to say that in spite of all the romantic elevation, do nothing more than to rush. (The word "rush" at this point is aware of me, whether its ambiguity was chosen. Interpreters of the world unite!)

So, Mr. crime writer Schmiester, leave us a little by the word "offender" stroll. It is immediately apparent that you have the word "offender" directly play a role that is likely to reduce the word on only one aspect. They claim the word correlates with an illegal, criminal doing as they happen, you do not explain. Instead, they claim in the usual high-handed tone of utter conviction that meaning is created from a linguistic convention, just as it had at some time been a meeting between the language-gods and the people who carved on which this interpretation for all eternity in stone. Well, on this memorable day of decision, I need it be at Sinai, but have been lying on the beach.

your description by no means defines the word "offender" but the term "perpetrator of a crime." Why do you associate the word "offender" with a crime, I could now explain psychoanalysis, but as long as you pay me but not a therapist salary, I would like to make an analysis of the work is not better. Instead, I would point out that your reduction only proves that you are not willing to stand by your own actions. Like all people who wish to gloss over the consequences of their actions, help yourself to the word "artist". This shows your true liberal convictions.

The word "artist" namely, Mr. Schmiester crime writer, you weigh yourself in the false appearance that there are actions that create not only nothing but. It's that simple but unfortunately not. Every action brings forth new, you are right, but also destroys every deed. With every deed we destroy the infinity of possibilities. Rather than assert that an act is still creative, you'd better think about your act destroyed the possibilities for all time. That is the responsibility to act, I mean.

This responsibility goes to the fact that you esteemed crime writer, once again completely off. Otherwise it is not to say that you believe herauszulesen serious analysis of my victims, I would therefore "the legal rights executed by the brutal power of the defeated, the victims of war and also the gas chambers in Auschwitz" insult. For such a result only a man can get, which is aimed rather than understand. The role of the judge I leave it to you but bestowed you. I will retain them in the picture, then play well the lawyer.

as with my analysis, I sacrifice to the fact that there are basically two different types of victims. First, there are those people who are victimized. These are the people who actually do not be a victim, where the self-determination but is taken. Then there are those people who make themselves victims, in order to justify your actions. On those same type of sacrifice I was referring to, since it is precisely that group willing victim. In the other group I have not been collected, very good reason, because I their self-determination eighth, for they do so just be a victim, but will be made to do so.

Let me take a historical example. Zionism lives in the belief that it can not address that Judaism is constantly made to the victim. To the achievement of an Israeli state and the Zionistinnen Zionists have finally shaken off the curse of the victim. That this development was bound to cause problems, it was clear from the beginning. The non-Jewish world had become accustomed to holding Jews as victims. As long as they bravely took the death of their enemies in the purchase, they were a popular subject at the good guy and an easy target of anti-Semites. But from that day, because they dared to defend himself, because you dared to action, began to lament. The Jews were perpetrators. But only to offenders in your definition of fact, Mr. Schmiester crime writer. Instead of looking for reasons for the individual actions, instead of recognizing that, particularly in Israel, every act of government hot and controversially discussed and criticized will be behind every act of Israel's population directly suspects a crime. The UN is no longer so after with resolutions that are imposed on this small country. But it had to come as well, because who years with the image of poisoners and murderers children grew up, can not now time to get used to another meaning of the word "offender" in connection with Jews.

you are in this respect, unfortunately, a typical German, master crime writer Schmiester. They belong to a nation, are responsible for Auschwitz, as the word slips willy-nilly into a negative area. But a nation that makes desert habitable, and the idea of democracy in a world that, where individual freedom is not respected, has a natural way, a better concept of "offenders".

Now that I have used the word "offender" again and used primarily in connection with Eretz Israel, you've virtually been a through ball for insults and misunderstandings, you can again decide whether to send me back only, or finally want to venture to the understanding. I hope you like Focus on understanding.

PS: have the movie "The Silence" by Ingmar Bergman, unfortunately, you probably do not quite understand. For now, this film deals with the consequences of a very special indeed. Being aware of your approaching death a terminally ill woman has decided in agreement with her sister to spend their own newborn child as the healthy sister. This act is in the film never directly addressed, but only hinted at. Nevertheless, the film shows the cruelty of this act in light of the fact that the child is now several years old, the birth mother is still alive. In shocking images, the film shows how you can live with such a deed, or better just can not live. This is only a tiny aspect of the film and would not Ingmar Bergman, to see if there were not many more. However, that you did not notice this aspect seems to be I can only explain with your very one-sided understanding of the word "offender".

PPS: Whether you trust me a prepuce schmockegal me to say the least, but again you have misunderstood something, the piece has the figure of the Christian is a prepuce. My penis is not the subject of the piece - even if it disappointed you. If you do, however, I can someday write a nice piece about my genitals. Such a piece will get to read it but only you, as a gift for this stimulating debate.

Buurmann,
theater director

Can Gallstones Cause Leg Num

What is theater? - Praise and delight

theater director Torches -
I'm delighted!

A good text, a beautiful text - and now we still read the essay by the Apollonian and Dionysian theater and inquire into the function of mimesis and catharsis, after Schiller's views of play and being human ... oh yes ...

beautiful But, but quite nice you have the ...

With shining eyes, I greet you,
was your
Schmiester (usually only a mystery writer)

A Blueprint For Making Karts

What is theater?

From the beginning, the theater is a game that Transform of texts, whether written or not, in a tissue of quotations, invasion and in motion, a seeking, even trembling. Theater is played, before it is written or spoken. Speaking and writing, the two supposed adversaries, interwoven yet separate, in the event they become a theater. In the theater makes man human services, as well as man in the synagogue, church or the mosque operates worship.

The dramatic text - orphans adopted, played - a building is built to collapse, both the tail and the head, unreasonable, without reference center because he is playing, neither absurd nor illogical crazy. Theater does not ask for the meaning, an interpretative revelation will not undermine longs, but. The rule of interpretation is exceeded and the vagueness of the Theater, without ceasing, again driven in an endless game. The origin of the theater is in the game, even and especially because it comes time to writing. For what is remaining in the creation of a play is more than a mere holding of an idea? A play that would not degenerate into a stretched across the stage shroud must be amorphous but malleable, the game ends on and around the boards. It must be habitable - the games can only be done from the inside - may not be enslaved.

Play is, to take risk, "to say yes to an absurdity, which obeys its own rules and felt again and again such Sense produces, as its other side understands the theater yet. We continue playing. What, what, where? Restless is all fashion sense again divided over the surface of the platform and dispersed, so as not to put in the limits which must act in the theater obvious. Theatre is a perpetual motion images and in contrast to the screen not just a template of the past, but ever present and original in his playing. Even the audience is involved with the theater - a great reference system. And yet the audience knows that it must end the show back out into the world to be found there in the footsteps of the shattered sense of a way.

(This text has been created in the game, with texts by Jacques Derrida and Sarah Kofman, and in conversation with Prof. Claudia Bickmann and Victoria Burke of the University of Cologne, which applies special thanks.)

Where Can You Watch Yaoi Online

of perpetrators and victims

silence
oh Theater director Buurmann ,

silence (incidentally a very interesting film by a thank you not familiar Ingmar Bergman in whichever certainly strange, so distant subject and aesthetics), the silence so (you obviously familiar only to the hackneyed Hamlet Quote) would be a virtue been to long since you already, in devotion and worship in awe and reverence, even if my so critical, and occasionally over with aplomb formulated grants should have carried away. "Si tacuisses," it says so, and I want you (You are their own admission but not more than a few chunks of the Arab powerful) to reflect on good German: "If you had kept silent, you would have remained a philosopher." - No, Theater director Buurmann, you smile now no, I will be not wise, I would have as the smile of a fool see well - so you go in and smile and chat no longer unconscious to himself, as just above your last one, which grazing embarrassing remarks to offenders and sacrifice, the wisdom of any alien.

the honor offender so you lift and him to the detriment of the victim, which you describe more defamatory than a subordinate bootlicker that defies any claim to any moral courage even, or disguised as a wolf with a white wool dress of sacrificial lamb - the offenders so you inaugurate, but, theater director Buurmann, you should probably know perfectly well that on the level of meaning of this word as a verbal agreement, the offender is correlated with an illegal, criminal actions, that the term has offenders a pejorative connotation and the acting out of pragmatism, because of a last resort or other materialist insights is not the same. So si ... tacuisses

Now I assume, however, you want (set the compulsion to be in any account) the passivity of the victim, make a Procrustes Prometheus, then, and not to face. After eliminating your linguistic sloppiness throw, theater director Buurmann here but a philosophical and ethical issue and keep it after you have strained the Hamlet (who qualifies as a doer not exactly, but this never would have wanted to be a culprit - sic), here are so dear to Goethe and his Faust - I may quote:

is written: "In the beginning was the word "stock
Here I have! Who should I afford? I
the Word so highly estimate impossible
I must translate it otherwise
when I am well inspired.
is written: "In the beginning was the Thought.
Remember that first line that your spring is not too hastily!
Is it the sense which has everything and make it?
should stand "In the beginning was the Power!
Yet, even while I write this,
already warned me that that I must be changed.
The spirit helps me! Suddenly I see
Council and write: In the beginning was the deed!

Now this is a singular overlifting to believe Buurmann venerable theater director, not the worst, no, no way would mean that at Faust and Goethe - but it is not the only opinion, viz: the truth. I want the discussion here are not too far, refer you, however, a theater director Buurmann on the texts that you should be familiar to Schiller and Shakespeare, in Macbeth or Wallenstein - because it is the fact, the perpetrator makes and Code of people originally problematic then - the Wallenstein's monologue in 1.Aufzug, 4.Szene now I want to characterize it in your memory:

"Were it possible? If I could not remember how I wanted to?
back No more, like me, you please?
I would accomplish the deed, because I thought?
The great God of heaven! It was not my seriousness,
beschloßne thing it never was. In just the thought I liked it! "

And Buurmann theater director, confessed to me not just that they had to repair the printer become active, had screwed him, but now that this device belongs to the garbage?

But now from the offender to victims : Since you write me that I was in my mea culpa has become the victim of your aggression! Dear Theater Manager: I have more than as the victim of my own aggression described, but I actually wrote full of empathy that I am sorry to have you done to my victim.
the now simply turn 180 degrees to your delight, and still feel this good?
you drive a cheap forgery under this retort and make me now with a rather peculiar analogy to the Nazi! Friend to forgive you now It's hard.
insult you by offering apply only usurped victims feel let the Nazis, the lack of rights executed by the brutal power of the defeated, the victims of war and also the gas chambers in Auschwitz ...

theater director Buurmann, you should think and then act or write or produce, but as long as these thoughtful in you is my desideratum I want you in spite of all posts to the site - because if you do not follow me to rub look or experience as a playwright your fiasco when the other hand, in the historical and political Analysis modest, but you seem to criticize an honest and efficient character. The playwright playwright respectively but was told that his latest piece at the time most of sand, but not yet full pay was.

binding on your page I remain so
you, you always think the right help,
Schmiester

PS: To be one of your PostScript told that I give you a prepuce not have expected, was that I kept to the bottom uncovered, as above. My mistake, I admit, I have read the text well to biographical, but it struck me between the scrotum and prepuce so on ...

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Candid Steal Syndrome

brains on the beach (5)

And again,
Mr. crime writer Schmiester ,
again have it done.

Even your first words breathe the spirit of subordination and transmission. Instead of addressing my admittedly aggressive arguments presented, you do not respond with counter-arguments, but simply say that I had tried to silence make.

So instead of reacting, crafts You prefer in your position as the victim of my aggression. This shows your back close to the literary terrorism. Instead of critically with the enemy and themselves deal, you say your victims rather position. Life is much easier than holding a victim as perpetrator. It is a kind of shield against arguments and above all, a victim is believed to be always on the good side. But this is not so, my dear sir crime writer. Even the Nazis thought they were a victim of the world. As a victim of Treaty of Versailles, as a victim of the Jews as victims of capitalism, as simply offering before the Lord. Even today there is this victim mentality. She lives in such sentences as: "It's going to be proud be allowed to be German! "It is as if there were somewhere a conspiracy, a Jewish at all, which forbids us to be proud of.

It is the German himself, who has a problem with it as a German, not the world. The world had quickly forgiven Germany, I would even dare to say, too fast. In 1955, Germany in NATO. The times you have to imagine: ten years after Germany had killed millions of people in brutal camps, it was a member of an association for the defense of Western values. From the murderers to the Democrats in only ten years. If this is not a career. A true German would say. Who knows, would Eichmann been born a little later, he had not organized the transports of Jews, but perhaps working for the preservation of Western liberal order. Click to see how is the face of pure bureaucracy, not the why but asks only about the how. Typically German? Dare I say: Yes!

But only almost. Adolf Eichmann was finally a member of the Austrian Nazi Party. In the case of Austria one can really only stand in amazement with my mouth open . It is almost amazing how it has managed to Austria, his obvious complicity in two world wars to cover up . Austria has among the Eyes of the world got done ", to pour his own shame in Mozart balls. Today's innocence regularly dances in the form of a singing blonde on the pasture and sings: "The hills are alive with the sound of music!" Austria has a truly excellent image campaign to shake off created their own fault. Austria has even managed to position themselves in accordance with the Moscow Declaration of the allies in 1943 as the first victim of the Nazis.

And in the end they were all just Victims. Also Eichmann . Victim of circumstance, victims of the bureaucracy. Victim of a chain of command. What the Nazis do not have anything organized for egg dances in Nuremberg and Jerusalem to be not so responsible. Much I could now bring against this excuse, but it's enough to quote here those judges who Adolf Eichmann 15 condemned in December 1961:

"By what coincidences of inner and outer nature, you may have always fallen on the way in which you were then to crime - between what you have actually done, and what others may be under the same circumstances would have done, is not a bridgeable gap . We are running only your actions on something real, and neither may not be criminal nature of your inner life and your motives that may have criminal tendencies of your environment. They have, as your life story told, represented as a jinx, and with knowledge of the conditions under which they lived, we are to some degree even willing to concede to you that it is highly unlikely that you under more favorable circumstances ever in this or any other criminal had appeared as a defendant. But even if we assume that it was pure bad luck consisting you a submissive tool has been in the organization of mass murder, it remains just yet, the fact that you have helped to carry out the policy of mass murder and therefore supports the policy active. Because if you rely on obedience, we want to hold you to that policy's not in the nursery is going on and that in the political realm of adults, the word obedience is just another word is better for the approval and support. "

can you can not put it. It is also quite surprising that while all the Nazis just always want to have commands executed, but no one wants to have given a command. It's just easier to be a victim. Much more difficult is it to be a perpetrator, because the fact is always the responsibility to act.

seem such a responsibility to act, Sir crime writer Schmiester to carry, do not want. And therefore, my good and dear friend, please spare me excuses instead and go one on my arguments. You will always remain a true and important friend for me, even if our times argumentative boxing's a low blow. We still remains the next Rosh Hashana .

want to your essay about the theater criticism, I write nothing here. Not yet. Maybe come I eventually returned it. Now is the first to confess without envy, that someone so prominent text as you wrote, you should first keep silent in awe. This is precisely what you have earned with the last text on Theater Review: awesome silence.

In the first place thus: ". The rest is silence



Sincerely,
your theater manager Buurmann .

PS: "Brains on the beach" is not my first work, as claimed by you. It is here only to "inside" recalls, which celebrated its premiere some time ago.

Pocketbook Cake Recipe

brains on the beach (4) and the dramatic criticism

I had you so promised to come back
theater director Buurmann,
on our disagreement with respect to your beach brain and the associated self-realization of your beach property in the sands of Severin's Castle Theater ...

... to your argument, especially against my published here criticizing your debut: this your Suada an injured I wanted to respond again to this choleric sweeping blow to unconsciousness, to this tsunami of your emotionally loaded most aggression (to yours, Mr. theater director!) what you wanted to make me gag, make me an apnea or hoped I carried away but at least your (your lonely opinion) the only true insight into the your (what hubris!) truths ...

Oh, theater director Buurmann insulted!, You got me more effective than you would have me believe anything. And they even want to hear nothing, nothing of the better, from my knowledge, therefore, nothing to see (a) you wanted to do carried away but bubbly me with an elaborate verbiage, trombones and resonant and klotzend - but always, as I would with the representation This sandy beach terrorists in your piece a Nazi sentiments imputed, looking with Schmackes and blood, furious at the real issue over. Call me so calm an old left hand, but I know that my complaint to you to be re-Nazi, this replica Pate was, call me just a small citizen and a notorious, paranoid alls: in terms of all the troublemakers, the shoe size of her IQ barely deviates, it must be a know it - not a petty bourgeois, no, but they said certainly "smart ass" and had with the terms once again made a mistake ....

However, Mr theater director, I now want to be quiet, I will restrain you no longer ask whether they are choleric or ADD child have been, no, I will do what I had done this a long time ago, before the apoplectic redness in your face still turns to bleach and your indignant waving of arms by the rigor mortis Schlagfuß be paralyzed - ah, a theater director Buurmann: I thought you do not trouble my head, I saw you always hairless and did not nothing able to be gray. But your soul, for you still, your soul, you know, I have to understand theater director Buurmann, now that is meanwhile so weak as Louise's lemonade - and so I want to thank you, theater director, a little bit now sorry .... When I

the following day, after I forced the evening before after visiting your brain piece from tiefstinnerster Not looking to write to you, so when I hours after the minutes and slept again looking through my text (which to me become a pleasant habit, since my own arguments still even check because I each ex-cathedra argument at the critical formulation is far away) than I thought so check my accusations against you was because I every change my substantive concerns away, but I thought I was lucky, I would have chosen a more moderate form, especially with regard to the allegation of dangerous rumbling in your fascist attitude. Therefore, above all, you're in your reply so got into violent convulsions, which you probably clouded his mind. But this is now counter-productive with regard to my educational intention - the ear, the you want to whisper to knowledge, should one not previously numb by blows. had

This weakness so I confess to have, but more and worse: I lost, who knows why, and the weakness, or rather the stupidity of the fairly frequently occurring critics who beyond their substantive reservations, especially with a campaign of destruction of the words shine look, in vain himself an even brighter light provide willing, as it would have been on the stage to criticize the event helpful their concerns, the could have been. Rightly, you have a question, a theater director Buurmann, with Goethe's anger responding, implicitly called me a dog and kill me want. Why? to shine with negative, destructive words as an eloquent champion of the language and the object of criticism without any constructive attitude or empathy is not helpful in the if access and moist armpits, do not open the sand glued eyes and redirect only for selfish motives applause to himself : the real specialty of many critics and become contemptible - I must be ashamed to have been misled in this respect and especially in the rhetoric my masterpiece to have made about you. They like to apologize Buurmann theater director, now.

The criticism is the theater director does not even scare, it is not a weapon, it is a Patch only has to put the knower to a wound that better knowledge in the attempt at mediation, the ugly, mangy body of dramatic blunder on ceiling. Here I have certainly now been missing and made me in common with those in the profession, to connect to the critic, as a gentleman Mindernickel have set out, where they were themselves kicked too many times over lift themselves in the fields where they never could exist. In the insight as an artist no capacity to be lent to the capacity of the critic, to conceal it: the audience with captivating verbiage and themselves by the odor of the hardness and sharpness, the artists involved to escape through this same arrogance and often more ruthless, the more the desiderata of the critic's secret before his inner eye of the arrogant, overbearing Camouflage accidentally stood on.

No, Buurmann theater director, to this criticism asters to the Goethe's verdict to be killed as a dog, fall prey to cope, I will not make public. Have you heard it, too? Scientific studies have shown that the critic has suffered in the ideal case, attention deficit and in order for ADHD syndrome have always been hyperactive, is that he was in the peer group of childhood, an outsider, often to the tenth year already, bedwetting and a baby is suffering from a phimosis, made the first erections intolerable and, out of shame remained undetected, preventing adolescent sexual intercourse, that a premature ejaculation to be a humiliating and made every confidence accepting misfortune of virile libido in the way and the unfortunate substitutes often enough to Homosexuality has driven, in which he had to be nor the effeminate part in accordance with an obsolete, the wife of long-term uncompensated devotion to a penetrating object. What wonder, then, this socially and sexually Failed from necessity, beyond his physical weakness of the intellectual penetrator for every theater director was. But I want that for you, Theater director Buurmann, not to be - I say it once young German, I will not fuck you (sorry), I'll just to satisfy your needs the best helping hand!

But I must nevertheless here and now against a ward of your anticipated attack, for you, a theater director Buurmann will not miss the opportunity to apply the identified characteristics of the critics on me to prove that I just about "wrote as I am accusing of having written, and that my apology was only a farce, a distraction from my designated by myself weaknesses. I have to come before you and your attacks on my integrity and critical reason ! Invalidate And so I have to remind you of necessity of an evening, as I told you, after a few glasses of absinthe, without any need to justify myself, learned first sexual practices in the tender age of 13 years from an au pair from Sweden Maid and have too many and not just exercised from the au pair area recruits continue as favorite student satisfaction as well as teachers. Remember? - I remember you then silence precludes any in you staked habit remained, your envious silence, I remember, but will not this envy rise again, as you prove in this way is that I made from birth a critic top these troubles me.

theater director Buurmann, despite all this, I admit here, it is my pleasure to measure me with you to cross the spring with you as Hamlet, who also thought daggers speak to - and should it happen again, that I firm to pursue you, then keep it to my grandma to goodness, I have always assured that belong to that rudeness rudeness.

remain in that sense I
your

crime author and you an affectionate friend Schmiester

PS: What Buurmann theater director, do you think of the Cologne light called Jewish Museum of the City Hall? A string of Gotham or higher diplomacy in democracy (as Kreti Pleti and may now vote, Schmidt and Pocher)?

Homemade Rice Crispy Treats Ingr

Cologne Lights

Yes, I am a literary choleric,
dear Mr. crime writer Schmiester ,
but at the Cologne lights I stay behind.

Before now, but quite despair of me, be sure to that naturally I would like to go with you hand in hand through the next century and that I have nothing positive to say about the Cologne lights. The Cologne lights at me disgusted, like any mass event where the individual human being is reduced to the gaping flesh mass. On the same day as the Cologne Lights Mario Barth in Berlin, the Olympic Hall filled with 70,000 people who enthusiastically cheered and drank your idol. These 70,000 people broke Mario Barth the record that was set before him by Chris Rock from the United States of America, the gathering was something less than 16,000 people.

surprising it does not me that has finally broken the record for a German, because if there is anything that the Germans are good at, then zusammenzurotten in laughing hordes order together with a guide to laugh at others.

Goethe has it in Faust (Part two) times as well described: "predestinated And

tracks Does the quantity through the corridor; the unrolled lies flags
Follow all - Sheep Nature"



This is probably the reason why the cabaret Germany is so successful. Front is the Inquisitor who chooses with the horde of arrogant know-alls in the audience a bogeyman, and then gleefully move here about this very enemy. What the cabaret little to rarely happened is true humor that dares to laugh at himself. No, the German cabaret will not laugh at himself, but on the other. First of all, can be mentioned as the other politicians. Well, most politicians have Spot deserve, just forget the Horde, the laughs in it, only too happy that it was the audience and people basically first sovereign of the state and is thus responsible for the misery. But no matter. Responsibility was yesterday. Today, we have the fun! Drum You ladies and gentlemen of the German cabaret: Blow the trumpet on that fool the German horde dancing. Of which the world comes under non! Which is indeed still used. Your Dared even make jokes about foreigners again, of course, the foreigner is an American.

Of course the others are never the terrorists, because terrorists were the Germans and even a long time. As the Nazis terrorized the world and the Democrats in their own country. Quickly developed a good cooperation between the National Socialist Germany and Islamic fascism. The relationship between the NSDAP and the Muslim Brotherhood're nachlesbar without problems. Basically, the terrorist for the German Otto-Normal-citizens not of others, but always he has declared himself And if you creep someday, why the Palestinian declaration calls to drive all Jews into the sea and why the terrorists really no other way out remained, as on 11 September 2001 mass murder commit, then the German will finally have a clear conscience and know deep down in his heart, but that it was an excusable reason for the Nazis. One can

first completely uninhibited Horde can finally tell a lot and at the Cologne lights, Mr crime writer Schmiester , you got me all on your side. What the staring material was then cut around the ears of propaganda, borders on brainwashing of the worst form. Since it was found seriously and with an undertone of regret :

"The Age of Enlightenment was reflected on the fireworks and also had the royal houses ! Saver

Yes, so, too, but a crap. But this is really stupid of the Enlightenment. As is so simple to me anything you nothing Therefore the Enlightenment and the king takes away the coal. Impudence!

was on the evening light show it in the general yearning for a disgusting dictatorship. For example the public in the coming fireworks of the dictatorship of China to the Olympic Games was made uncritically tasty. I thought my ears not to be trusted.

On funniest but I found the moment when it was pointed out that in the Europe of the 14th Century, the fireworks at the church and those in power beyond the military use as intimidating Art resources was popular because it can show you've really, God-given looks like religious and royal power. Then I thought only very quiet with me, who's probably the rulers of this Cologne lights. But to answer this question here a wide field, sir, is crime writer Schmiester , too wide a field. Instead, it is

once again return to Mario Barth . Is already determined by one or the other have thought my criticism was inappropriate, because after all laugh Mario Barth not the others, but always Not at all about himself! At first The view seems to be that way. If you watch Mario Barth how he made fun of his relationship in particular and the relationship between man and woman in general, though, is it actually entices you to believe, as someone laugh at yourself you look only a bit more closely, one will see that the whole humor only works on an old-fashioned, almost reactionary division of humanity into an outdated man-woman scheme. Mario Barth created the man as the other for the wife and the woman as the radical Other to man in the audience they sit, the people who give voluntarily to the Other leave, only to turn around so the others can laugh. A truly dialectical masterpiece of Barth . Might almost be supposed that he had read Hegel, but only almost.

Barth has created a brave new world in which everyone on the other for the other make can only laugh about it each and every one has something. A moral obligation to the other is not. The other is merely the reflection of the Grotesque own net. Almost too funny to be true.

remain in that sense, I wonder,
your theater director Buurmann .


PS: In my piece I have not defaced scrotum verbally, as you have said in your last letter, but the prepuce , but by a man who can not distinguish from Hebrew to Arabic, I do not demand that he find the difference white between the scrotum and foreskin. I hope (if only representative of your life companion) that you better in the female anatomy go.